“Nation’s Report Card” Scores Suspect

U H Home Search University of Houston
Login | Site Map | Print Last Updated: Dec 2nd, 2010 - 14:58:02 
News / Op-Ed 
 
 News Stories / by Issue
 
 
 
  • Education & Affordable Housing
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Alternative News Websites (RSS)
 
 Reference Pages
 
 Media Critiques
 
 Editorials / Columns
 
 Interviews
 
 PALESTINE Bureau
 
 Radio Shows
 
 TV Shows
 
 



Non-Profit Partners
University of Houston
KPFT 90.1-FM
HMS Cable-Access Ch. 17

Education & Affordable Housing

“Nation’s Report Card” Scores Suspect
By Scott O.Shaffer
Nov 1, 2005, 14:17

Check for Audio
Check for Video
 Text only
Email this article
Download Quicktime
for Audio/Video.

The National Association of Education Progress recently released fourth and eighth grade reading and math scores on the “Nation’s Report Card.” Shirley J. Neely, the state’s Commissioner of Education summarized Texas results recently by saying, “Texas students outperformed the national average on three of four NAEP tests.”

But a closer look at how “Report Card” scores are generated in Texas suggests parents and the media should be skeptical of Commissioner Neely’s remarks.

The “Report Card” excludes students with disabilities or are “English language learners” from taking the tests. NAEP does not give the tests to those that can only read or do math in a foreign language or have a special education-related need in taking the tests.

On the other hand, state achievement tests, such as the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills test, do make provisions for these special circumstances and include these students in its testing programs.

Eleven percent of fourth and eighth grade students selected to take the 2005 NAEP reading tests were excluded in Texas because they had learning disabilities or were English language learners. Only three states excluded a higher percentage of its students' reading sample: Delaware (13 percent), Louisiana (14 percent) and Virginia (12 percent).

NAEP excluded six percent of Texas fourth and eighth graders with disabilities or language problems from taking its math tests. Only Delaware, where eight percent of the sampled students were excluded for these reasons, eliminated a higher percentage of students from the NAEP math test.

Critics believe if every student on every selected campus does not have the same chance of being chosen to take the test, if the student sample is not random or if all Texas schools are not sampling students in the same way “Report Card” scores are meaningless.

Dr. Walter Haney, a Boston College education professor and an expert witness in the recent Texas public school finance court cases, says NAEP grade-level results are further and inevitably confounded with the rates at which kids are being held back or failed.

“This means that in states with high levels of grade retention, the (NAEP) grade samples are sampling older students that are more likely to do well,” Haney said.

According to Haney, Texas is a state with relatively high levels of grade retention, thus the NAEP scores are further distorted.

The card is the only nationally representative and continuing assessment of what American students know and can do in various subject areas. NAEP reports scores for individual states and the nation but not for individual schools or students.

The U.S. Commissioner of Education Statistics in the US Department of Education is responsible by law for carrying out the “Report Card” project.

Critics say parents should call on Commissioner Neely to make the student selection process on the “Nation’s Report Card” more transparent and fully explain what the NAEP scores mean and what they do not mean.

The same critics contend Neely should also make it clear that NAEP scores are significantly different from state test scores and must be interpreted differently. Thus, parents and legislators would better understand how public schools are doing in educating all Texas children.





© Copyright World Internet News 2006-07

Top of Page

Education & Affordable Housing
Legislators Attempting to Open Educational Doors for Undocumented US Residents
Home Schooling in Houston
“Nation’s Report Card” Scores Suspect
Philosophical Divide Threatens Future of Texas School Children
Public Invited to Debate on Education Finance Reform
School Finance Reform Bills Dead for Now
School Finance Tops Dewhurst's List of Priorities
Educators Attempt To Fight Bullying In Schools
Major Win for Tuition Remission at UH
Inaccurate Dropout Reports Hide Problem Among Hispanics
Top University Administrators: Too Well Paid?
Experts Disagree on Hispanic Dropout Rates
Teachers in Short Supply
Crime Fails to Leave as New Residents Move-in to Houston’s Third Ward
New Face for the Fourth Ward: Community Developers Work to Improve Neighborhood
Rehabbing Robin Hood
UH School of Communication May Be Left Behind
Progress Comes with a Price in Fairfield
Boney Attempts to Find Place for Low Income Families in Fourth Ward
Destruction of Low-Income Housing Displaces Residents
Stealing the Fourth Ward
Robin Hood is Working
Objective State-Wide Testing: Lots of Criticism, Different Remedies


University of Houston State of Texas Privacy and Policies Homeland Security Compact with Texans Reporting Copyright Infringement Contact U H Feedback Site Map Statewide Search U H System