U H Home Search University of Houston
Login | Site Map | Print Last Updated: May 18th, 2007 - 13:56:37 
News / Op-Ed 
 
 News Stories / by Issue
 corporate upper class / consumer rights
 democractic participation / social movements
 education & housing
 environment, pollution & animal rights
 everyday life & health
 human / civil rights
 working poor & life chances
 mass transit & energy use
 
 Media Critiques
 
 Editorials / Columns
 
 Interviews
 
 Reference Pages
 
 News Websites
 
 PALESTINE Bureau
 
 Radio Shows
 
 TV Shows
 
 



Non-Profit Partners
University of Houston
KPFT 90.1-FM
HMS Cable-Access Ch. 17

mass transit & energy use

Houston Voters Approve First Metro Rail Line
By Georgianna Dobson
Nov 21, 2001, 18:09

Check for Audio
Check for Video
 Text only
Email this article
Download Quicktime
for Audio/Video.
With the passage of Proposition 1 in November 2001 election, all taxpayers that reside in the Metropolitan Transit Authority’s jurisdiction are guaranteed the right to vote on any future rail projects that involve public debt. Proposition 3, which was placed on the ballot to halt the existing work of MetroRail was defeated.

In 1988, Houston area voters approved a general plan that included new buses, road improvements and a “system connector.” The connector, however, was not considered as a separate issue, and therefore the vote should be invalidated, according to opponents like “Let the People Vote.”

MetroRail has had problems as early as five years after Metro was created in 1978. A referendum in June 1983 that concerned new Metro rail plans was voted down. The 1988 approval was quickly followed by the election of former Mayor Bob Lanier, who ran an anti-rail campaign. In 1991, U.S. Rep. Tom Delay, R-TX, moved to kill $65 million in federal funding for Metro’s light rail project.

Today, Metro is solely funded by its own revenues, according to MetroRail representative Earnest True. The project is only about a third of the 23.4 mile-long original plan, which would have run from downtown to the Texas Medical Center and to Greenway Plaza and The Galleria, but Metro’s expenses are still significant.

Metro unanimously passed its 2002 budget in September, but the agency plans to use some of its reserve funding to compensate for expected revenues that cannot cover the cost of MetroRail and other Metro improvement costs.

An increase in fare has not been necessary thus far, but True admitted that he wasn’t sure if by 2004, the projected completion date of MetroRail, Metro would need to increase fares from the current $2 daily pass.

“We’ve tapped into quite a bit of our reserves already, so this calls for creative financing,” True said.

MetroRail has begun constructing the 7.5 mile-long rail line, which will run from the Astrodome through the Texas Medical Center and to downtown. Gilda Ramirez of Metro’s Community Outreach and Development Department said MetroRail is a “good amenity.”

It will displace 1200 bus trips, improve transit schedules and improve the air quality of that area because of the decrease in buses’ emissions, according to True.

Metro also has plans of improving the framework for further transit development over the next 25 years and will be holding its first public hearing for “Metro Mobility 2025” on Thursday, Dec. 6.


© Copyright World Internet News 2006-07

Top of Page

mass transit & energy use
Big Oil Looking for a Government Handout
Greater Houston Partnership and Metro: A Little History
DeLaying Light Rail
Hybrid Cars Are Gaining In Popularity
Light Rail Faces Opposition in Houston
Light Rail Promotes Olympics, Hurts Business
Houston Voters Approve First Metro Rail Line
Oppostion Again Seeking to De-Rail Transit in Houston
Anti-Rail Forces Try Again to Kill Rail Transit


University of Houston State of Texas Privacy and Policies Homeland Security Compact with Texans Reporting Copyright Infringement Contact U H Feedback Site Map Statewide Search U H System